On the topic of turning Gorakhpur airport into an international airport, Puri said that the UP government is unable to give 60 acres of extra land, which the AAI asked for, as it is a \"forest land\"

This concluding Part III looks at several critical questions that the SC verdict throws up regarding the application of certain principles of law which have been used to arrive at conclusions as well as the large implications of the ruling

In Part II of this 3-Part series, the article looks at some of the other critical evidence the Supreme Court considered before it gave the judgement in favour of the Hindus and granted five acres of alternate land to the Muslims

The Supreme Court claims that its Ayodhya verdict is not based on faith and belief of the Hindus but on credible and admissible evidence. But that is clearly not the case and it raises many serious questions for jurists and social scientists to ponder. In Part I of a three-part series, this article looks at some of the key evidence the SC examined to arrive at its conclusions

\"We will decide whether we will take it or not. If the Board decides to take land in its meeting, we will decide how it is to be taken and what will be its condition,\" said UP Sunni Central Waqf Board Chairman Zufar Farooqui

The verdict awarded the land at the heart of the clash to a Hindu litigant over Muslim objections and represents a major victory for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, The Washington Post reported