Zepto wins interim trademark battle as Delhi High Court restrains NBFC's use of brand name

Zepto wins interim trademark battle as Delhi High Court restrains NBFC's use of brand name

The High Court prohibited the defendants from using the marks "Zepto" and "Zepto Finance" until further orders

Advertisement
    Share:
Quick- commerce platform ZeptoQuick- commerce platform Zepto
Business Today Desk
  • Jul 23, 2026,
  • Updated Jul 23, 2026 11:18 AM IST

The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to quick- commerce platform Zepto, temporarily restraining non- banking financial company (NBFC) Naman Finlease and its directors from using the trademarks "Zepto" and "Zepto Finance" in their lending business in a trademark infringement dispute. The order was issued by Justice Jyoti Singh in a suit filed by Zepto, represented by Senior Advocate Swati Sukumar.

Advertisement

Court grants relief

The High Court prohibited the defendants from using the marks "Zepto" and "Zepto Finance" until further orders. It also ordered that the domain name zeptofinance. com must not be transferred to any entity associated with the defendants during the proceedings, according to LiveLawBiz.

READ THIS: Used the wrong birth date for school admission? Delhi HC allows correction but fines parents ₹2 lakh

Zepto claims brand confusion

In submissions before the court, Zepto stated that it is the registered owner of the word mark and device mark "ZEPTO, " describing it as a coined term with no descriptive meaning or connection to any specific service.

The company told the court it discovered the alleged infringement after receiving legal notices and court summons that were actually meant for the defendants' lending business operating under the name "Zepto Finance." Zepto argued that this indicated actual marketplace confusion and risked harming its brand reputation.

Advertisement

Defendants have no registered rights

Representing Zepto, Senior Advocate Swati Sukumar argued that neither "Zepto" nor "Zepto Finance" was registered in favour of the defendants, though they had filed a pending trademark application.

She urged the court to prevent the defendants from using the disputed marks and also requested an order to stop the transfer of the zeptofinance. com domain while the case is pending, according to LiveLawBiz.

ALSO READ: Don't waste our time, we are not interested in videos: CJI refuses urgent listing of plea against crackdown on CJP protestors

High Court accepts prima facie case

After reviewing the submissions, Justice Jyoti Singh issued an ad-interim order restraining Naman Finlease and its directors from using the trademarks "Zepto" and "Zepto Finance" for their lending activities. The court also blocked any transfer of the disputed domain name until the next hearing.

Advertisement

The case will now proceed before the Joint Registrar on August 21, with the High Court hearing the interim injunction application on November 30.

The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to quick- commerce platform Zepto, temporarily restraining non- banking financial company (NBFC) Naman Finlease and its directors from using the trademarks "Zepto" and "Zepto Finance" in their lending business in a trademark infringement dispute. The order was issued by Justice Jyoti Singh in a suit filed by Zepto, represented by Senior Advocate Swati Sukumar.

Advertisement

Court grants relief

The High Court prohibited the defendants from using the marks "Zepto" and "Zepto Finance" until further orders. It also ordered that the domain name zeptofinance. com must not be transferred to any entity associated with the defendants during the proceedings, according to LiveLawBiz.

READ THIS: Used the wrong birth date for school admission? Delhi HC allows correction but fines parents ₹2 lakh

Zepto claims brand confusion

In submissions before the court, Zepto stated that it is the registered owner of the word mark and device mark "ZEPTO, " describing it as a coined term with no descriptive meaning or connection to any specific service.

The company told the court it discovered the alleged infringement after receiving legal notices and court summons that were actually meant for the defendants' lending business operating under the name "Zepto Finance." Zepto argued that this indicated actual marketplace confusion and risked harming its brand reputation.

Advertisement

Defendants have no registered rights

Representing Zepto, Senior Advocate Swati Sukumar argued that neither "Zepto" nor "Zepto Finance" was registered in favour of the defendants, though they had filed a pending trademark application.

She urged the court to prevent the defendants from using the disputed marks and also requested an order to stop the transfer of the zeptofinance. com domain while the case is pending, according to LiveLawBiz.

ALSO READ: Don't waste our time, we are not interested in videos: CJI refuses urgent listing of plea against crackdown on CJP protestors

High Court accepts prima facie case

After reviewing the submissions, Justice Jyoti Singh issued an ad-interim order restraining Naman Finlease and its directors from using the trademarks "Zepto" and "Zepto Finance" for their lending activities. The court also blocked any transfer of the disputed domain name until the next hearing.

Advertisement

The case will now proceed before the Joint Registrar on August 21, with the High Court hearing the interim injunction application on November 30.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Business Today Desk

Business Today brings you the latest news, views and analysis from the world of finance, economy, markets, corporates, startups, tech, and the digital economy. You can find everything from breaking news to deep dives to immersive essays and more on a variety of subjects across all formats - online, magazine, television, data visualisation, et al.

Read more!
Advertisement