Amitabh Bachchan's name, image, voice protected as Delhi HC grants permanent injunction

Amitabh Bachchan's name, image, voice protected as Delhi HC grants permanent injunction

Bachchan had approached the court seeking protection of his publicity rights and privacy, along with relief against passing off and damages

Advertisement
    Share:
Mumbai Police probe threat email to BMC and school naming Amitabh BachchanBollywood megastar Amitabh Bachchan’s personality rights case
Business Today Desk
  • Nov 9, 2026,
  • Updated Nov 9, 2026 4:43 PM IST

The Delhi High Court has granted a permanent injunction in Bollywood megastar Amitabh Bachchan’s personality rights case, restraining the unauthorised commercial use of his name, image, voice and other aspects of his identity.

The order was passed by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav on November 5, bringing the legal proceedings against the defendants to a close, Bar and Bench reported on Saturday.

Advertisement

Bachchan had approached the court seeking protection of his publicity rights and privacy, along with relief against passing off and damages. The case involved the alleged unauthorised use of his identity across digital platforms and commercial products, including mobile applications, WhatsApp messages, quiz books, posters and internet domain names.

READ THIS: From Jesus & Mary College student to the Chief Justice's chair: Who is Justice B V Nagarathna, set for a 37-day CJI stint?

According to the court order, one defendant had developed a mobile application titled ‘Amitabh Bachchan Video Call’. Another had circulated WhatsApp messages featuring the actor’s photograph to promote a purported ‘Kaun Banega Crorepati’ lottery. The suit also involved a publisher selling a general knowledge quiz book bearing Bachchan’s image and defendants associated with the sale of posters and registration of domain names using his identity.

Advertisement

Four defendants agree to settlement

During the proceedings, four defendants settled with Bachchan and acknowledged his publicity and privacy rights. They undertook not to use his name, image, voice, likeness or any other aspect of his persona without his express permission.

As part of the settlement, the developer stated that steps had been taken to delete the mobile application, while the publisher discontinued the quiz book featuring the actor’s image. Another defendant stopped selling posters bearing Bachchan’s name and likeness. The court was also informed that the domain name ‘amitabhbachchan.in’ had been deleted in November 2022.

Court extends protection against unidentified infringers

The High Court also granted relief against other defendants who failed to appear or submit written statements despite being served with summons. It observed that the unauthorised use of Bachchan’s name and photographs for commercial gain could falsely suggest his endorsement.

Advertisement

ALSO READ: 'AQI already touching 400': CJI-led bench flags rising pollution levels, says this on Delhi-NCR traffic

Recognising the continuing misuse of the actor’s identity through websites, applications, posters and messaging platforms, the court extended the injunction to unidentified individuals, referred to as John Does.

The court held that the case did not require a trial to establish disputed facts and that the relief could be granted through a decree. It also allowed Bachchan to initiate fresh legal proceedings if a new cause of action arises.

The Delhi High Court has granted a permanent injunction in Bollywood megastar Amitabh Bachchan’s personality rights case, restraining the unauthorised commercial use of his name, image, voice and other aspects of his identity.

The order was passed by Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav on November 5, bringing the legal proceedings against the defendants to a close, Bar and Bench reported on Saturday.

Advertisement

Bachchan had approached the court seeking protection of his publicity rights and privacy, along with relief against passing off and damages. The case involved the alleged unauthorised use of his identity across digital platforms and commercial products, including mobile applications, WhatsApp messages, quiz books, posters and internet domain names.

READ THIS: From Jesus & Mary College student to the Chief Justice's chair: Who is Justice B V Nagarathna, set for a 37-day CJI stint?

According to the court order, one defendant had developed a mobile application titled ‘Amitabh Bachchan Video Call’. Another had circulated WhatsApp messages featuring the actor’s photograph to promote a purported ‘Kaun Banega Crorepati’ lottery. The suit also involved a publisher selling a general knowledge quiz book bearing Bachchan’s image and defendants associated with the sale of posters and registration of domain names using his identity.

Advertisement

Four defendants agree to settlement

During the proceedings, four defendants settled with Bachchan and acknowledged his publicity and privacy rights. They undertook not to use his name, image, voice, likeness or any other aspect of his persona without his express permission.

As part of the settlement, the developer stated that steps had been taken to delete the mobile application, while the publisher discontinued the quiz book featuring the actor’s image. Another defendant stopped selling posters bearing Bachchan’s name and likeness. The court was also informed that the domain name ‘amitabhbachchan.in’ had been deleted in November 2022.

Court extends protection against unidentified infringers

The High Court also granted relief against other defendants who failed to appear or submit written statements despite being served with summons. It observed that the unauthorised use of Bachchan’s name and photographs for commercial gain could falsely suggest his endorsement.

Advertisement

ALSO READ: 'AQI already touching 400': CJI-led bench flags rising pollution levels, says this on Delhi-NCR traffic

Recognising the continuing misuse of the actor’s identity through websites, applications, posters and messaging platforms, the court extended the injunction to unidentified individuals, referred to as John Does.

The court held that the case did not require a trial to establish disputed facts and that the relief could be granted through a decree. It also allowed Bachchan to initiate fresh legal proceedings if a new cause of action arises.

Read more!
Advertisement