Advertisement
Stray dogs case: Shashi Tharoor wants funds to animal welfare groups, not municipalities; here's why

Stray dogs case: Shashi Tharoor wants funds to animal welfare groups, not municipalities; here's why

He suggested diverting these funds to credible animal welfare groups and NGOs with proven track records in implementing the Animal Birth Control (ABC) programme.

Business Today Desk
Business Today Desk
  • Updated Aug 13, 2025 7:14 PM IST
 Stray dogs case: Shashi Tharoor wants funds to animal welfare groups, not municipalities; here's whyTharoor's remarks came in response to a comment by advocate Ashutosh Dubey under Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Saket Gokhale's post, who defended the court’s order as a necessary judicial intervention.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has welcomed the Supreme Court’s recent directions on managing stray dogs in Delhi but called for a change in how funds are used to tackle the problem. He suggested diverting these funds to credible animal welfare groups and NGOs with proven track records in implementing the Animal Birth Control (ABC) programme.

Advertisement

Sharing his view on X, Tharoor wrote that the real flaw is not the lack of resources, but the unwillingness or inability of municipalities to perform the task of rounding up and neutering stray dogs, even when funds have been provided.

"These funds are never actually spent where needed — in making the arrangements that the SC, in understandable exasperation, has now decreed. Perhaps the funds should instead be allotted to Animal Welfare groups and sincere NGOs with a track record of sheltering animals? They are more likely to implement the ABC programme than the municipalities are," he added.

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisement

Tharoor's remarks came in response to a comment by advocate Ashutosh Dubey under Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Saket Gokhale's post, who defended the court’s order as a necessary judicial intervention.

Dubey noted that the bench acted under its constitutional powers to balance public safety with administrative responsibility, following repeated failures by local authorities to control rabies-related deaths and dog attacks despite existing laws.

He added that the order does not permit “wanton cruelty” but calls for regulated removal, sheltering, vaccination, and sterilisation of aggressive strays in line with the ABC Rules and PCA Act.

The apex court’s directions, issued under Articles 32 and 142, call for identifying and sheltering aggressive strays in regulated facilities, while ensuring vaccination, sterilisation, and opportunities for adoption. “The order is not arbitrary,” Dubey said, adding that it aligns with Article 21 rights “not only of animals, but also of citizens, especially children and the elderly.”

Advertisement

He stressed that judicial intervention became necessary “after years of non-compliance by civic bodies and the rising number of fatalities.”

On Monday,  The Supreme Court has directed the Delhi government, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) to immediately remove stray dogs from all localities, particularly in vulnerable areas, stressing there should be “no compromise” in the exercise.

A Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan directed authorities to start the process without delay, even setting up a special force if required, stating that making all localities free of stray dogs “should be the first and foremost exercise.

The judges cautioned that contempt proceedings would be initiated against anyone obstructing the process, including animal rights activists, saying, “If any individual or organisation comes in the way, we will proceed to take action.”

Published on: Aug 13, 2025 6:23 PM IST
    Post a comment0