In a move that hints at ending of row between Indian tax authorities
and Vodafone, the Revenue Department on Friday sent a reply to the British telecom major's
representation on Rs 11,200 crore tax issue and also expressed its willingness to discuss the matter with company officials.
"Revenue department has written that the secretary and the CBDT chief are keen to settle the case," a finance ministry official said.
"Finance Ministry has replied to Vodafone on tax case.
In its reply to the tax reminder notice
sent by the revenue department last week, Vodafone had said it believes it is not liable to pay tax for its $11.2 billion acquisition of Indian telecom business of Hutchison Whampoa.
"Vodafone has replied to this reminder, stating that it continues to believe that no tax is payable on the above transaction," the British firm had said in its reply to the revenue department's reminder notice.
The tax case relates to capital gains tax arising from the sale of telecom business by Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa that involved Indian assets to Vodafone in 2007. The reminder did not include any deadline for payment of the tax.
The Income Tax department on October 22, 2010 passed an order determining a tax liability (including interest) of Rs 11,218 crore on Vodafone for the deal which took place in Cayman Islands in 2007.
The Supreme Court, however, quashed the order in January 2012. After the apex court's ruling, the Income Tax Act was amended with retrospective effect to bring into the tax net such overseas merger and acquisition deals that involve Indian assets.
Section 119 of the Finance Act, 2012, seeks to validate the October 2010 order of the Income Tax department. The department had also passed an order imposing a penalty of Rs 7,900 crore on Vodafone in April, 2011.
Last April, Vodafone had also threatened the Indian government with arbitration proceedings in its fight over the retrospective tax proposal.
Recently, another senior finance ministry had said that the ministry is working towards an amicable resolution of the retrospective tax amendment issue.
With PTI inputs