Explaining how this situation came to be, Singh conveyed that according to the United Nations System of National Accounts (UNSNA), the member countries are required to revise the base year of their macro-economic indicators like Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Gross Value Added (GVA), etc. periodically, to better capture the structural changes in the economy.
The exercise of base year revision of national accounts is guided by the Advisory Committee on National Accounts Statistics (ACNAS) comprising experts from the central and state government, academia, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and other domain-specific experts.
While selecting a new base year, several activities, including new surveys, are to be planned and carried out to have the latest data for use in the revised base year.
Singh explained, in the written reply, that the ACNAS had earlier recommended to consider 2017-18 as the new base year. However, in the last meeting of ACNAS held on October 30, 2019, it was decided that 2017-18 may not be considered as the new base year as it was not a normal year.
"In addition, due to non-availability of additional data on consumption, employment, unincorporated manufacturing and services sectors etc., it was decided that instead of 2017-18, the year 2020-21 may be considered as base year for revision," stated Singh.
However, he added that during during the above mentioned meeting of ACNAS, 2018-19 and 2019-20 were also ruled out for consideration of base year due to lack of requisite data sets for revision.
Also read: India's current account deficit widens to 2.7% of GDP during Oct-Dec
Also read: India's GDP estimated to grow at 7.4% in FY23, RBI rate hike by FY-end: FICCI