The requirement will apply to those seeking B1 and B2 visas for business and tourism and is set to take effect from April 2.
What the visa bond rule means
Under the programme, eligible applicants must pay a $15,000 bond as part of their visa process. The government says the measure is designed to discourage visitors from overstaying their permitted duration in the United States.
Officials indicated that the bond will be refunded if travellers comply with visa conditions and return to their home country on time, or if they ultimately do not travel.
The State Department official said the visa bond program has reduced the number of people who overstay their visas.
Countries added to the list
The latest expansion includes:
-
Cambodia
-
Ethiopia
-
Georgia
-
Grenada
-
Lesotho
-
Mauritius
-
Mongolia
-
Mozambique
-
Nicaragua
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Seychelles
-
Tunisia
These countries join an existing group of 38 nations already covered under the programme, including Bangladesh, Nepal, Nigeria, Cuba, Venezuela, Uganda and Tanzania, among others.
Previously included 38 countries:
-
Algeria
-
Angola
-
Antigua and Barbuda
-
Bangladesh
-
Benin
-
Bhutan
-
Botswana
-
Burundi
-
Cabo Verde
-
Central African Republic
-
Côte d’Ivoire
-
Cuba
-
Djibouti
-
Dominica
-
Fiji
-
Gabon
-
The Gambia
-
Guinea
-
Guinea-Bissau
-
Kyrgyzstan
-
Malawi
-
Mauritania
-
Namibia
-
Nepal
-
Nigeria
-
São Tomé and Príncipe
-
Senegal
-
Tajikistan
-
Tanzania
-
Togo
-
Tonga
-
Turkmenistan
-
Tuvalu
-
Uganda
-
Vanuatu
-
Venezuela
-
Zambia
-
Zimbabwe
A total of 50 countries are now covered under the visa bond programme. India is not on the list.
Part of a broader immigration push
The visa bond rule is part of a wider set of immigration measures introduced since President Donald Trump returned to office.
These include stepped-up deportations, revocation of visas and green cards, and tighter scrutiny of applicants’ social media activity and public statements.
Last June, the administration also imposed a travel ban affecting citizens from 19 countries on national security grounds.
Criticism and government response
Human rights groups have criticised the administration’s immigration policies, arguing that they undermine due process protections and restrict free speech.
The Trump administration and its allies, however, maintain that the measures are necessary to strengthen domestic security and prevent immigration violations.