Why getting consumption growth back on track will be more difficult than simply reducing taxes or interest rates
The government cannot stop or slow down spending - the economy is already losing steam with exports, private consumption and private sector investment slowing down
Despite the list of achievements of Modi 1.0 that Sitharaman talked about, and the new targets she laid out - in terms of piped water to rural households, a common power grid etc - there was actually no tough decision or new idea that the Finance Minister announced
The focus of the chapters in the Economic Survey 2019 is interesting, both for what they talk about and also for what they omit to discuss
Union Budget 2019: Even as we head for the first Budget of Prime Minister Modi's second term, news is coming out that the government is planning to help Air India and telecom PSU siblings, BSNL and MTNL, raise massive debt in order to keep them running
In India, quite a few high yield bonds were not considered particularly risky - the paper was largely issued by big, reputed brand names, and were often initially graded with triple A or equivalent credit ratings
It is increasingly becoming clear that the idea of debt being safer than equity was illusory at best
Jet Airways was largely Naresh Goyal's entire life and he was known to be fairly parsimonious in his travels and business expenses
The bankers are well aware that if they don't give out the money, the Jet board has recommended stopping operations
In the last four budgets, AI did not find any mention. The government itself has not made noise about artificial intelligence being a focus area in the past four years.
The stand-in Finance Minister may talk of a minuscule fiscal slippage or put a brave face and say the government would still meet its fiscal deficit targets.
How Indian politicians realised that creating a more equal society was a bad idea and not conducive to winning elections
The government's decision to recapitalise the ailing public sector banks without first fixing the management problems is a bad idea.
The Modi government has always had an uneasy relationship with digital marketplaces. The new regulations only show more evidences of its confused goals
Critics have already started saying that Shaktikanta Das is Modi's and Jaitley's man, and therefore will do exactly what they tell him to do.
The problems with SMEs, troubled power companies, and NBFCs have hardly been created by the RBI. And while the government would love to believe that a more reasonable (or pliable) central bank will solve all the problems, this is not going to happen.
Over the past six months, it had become apparent that the quiet Patel was increasingly at loggerheads with the Finance Ministry and, unexpectedly, he was sticking to his guns and refusing to be cowed by the Finance Ministry.
If anything, this data revision by the government, which shows that the growth during the UPA years is even lower than the growth in the past four years, is hard to reconcile for one reason -- the first UPA government witnessed tremendous economic tailwinds.
The cleanup of the financial system was actually initiated by the previous governor, Raghuram Rajan, when he started the Asset Quality Review (AQR) of banks in July 2015, which forced banks to stop ever greening loans and owe up to their bad loans.
PM Modi got lucky in the early part of his tenure when crude prices fell sharply. But in the run up to the elections, his luck on the economic front seems to have run out.
Nobel Prize winners in Chemistry could have equally won the prize for Physics, Physiology or Medicine, and those in Physics could have also been considered for prizes in Medicine or Chemistry.





