He said that the growing influence of China through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is also a concern, and the clout of India has been waning in a politically unstable Nepal. “At the same time, it's apparent that the young rebels in Nepal are wary of any perceived "India hand" or "China hand" in their internal politics,” he said.
Tharoor, referred to the ‘same toolkit’ theory that suggests similarities between the regime changes in South Asian countries, raising suspicions of a larger, coordinated effort by the West to destabilise the region. “I tend to be sceptical of most conspiracy theories - the world is often more susceptible to random events than the paranoiacs believe - India must of course bear such concerns in mind and monitor these developments closely,” he said.
“A policy of non-interference – essential to show arms-length respect for the internal affairs of a sovereign neighbour – must be balanced with a proactive, yet subtle, strategy to safeguard our interests,” he said, adding that India must avoid micromanaging Nepal’s internal politics. Past attempts have been counterproductive, he added.
Nevertheless, India must focus on Nepal’s development and its own ‘soft power’, instead of political meddling. India must complete existing projects on time, invest in new ones, promote educational and cultural exchanges, open new channels of communication, and understand aspirations and grievances.
Tharoor added that India must, even so, heighten vigilance across the border to prevent spillover of violence or infiltration.
“New Delhi must understand the deep-seated anger that led to this uprising and respond with a nuanced, long-term strategy that prioritises mutual respect, economic cooperation, and security, while leaving the political heavy-lifting to the Nepali people themselves,” he said, adding that that’s what taxpayers pay diplomats for – to strike the right balance with other countries.