A second spike between 15:24:08 and 15:24:20 lifted the index by 132.67 points, while the third, between 15:25:49 and 15:26:17, resulted in a 405.08-point jump. SEBI noted that the movements occurred within periods ranging from two seconds to 28 seconds.
The regulator also observed a general downward trajectory in the Sensex between 15:21:03 and 15:26:00, which was interrupted by the sharp upward movements.
Copthall’s aggressive buy orders
According to SEBI, Copthall accounted for 86.6% of the gross buy value in Sensex constituents during the CAS, with gross purchases of ₹191.29 crore.
During the first spike, 88 buy orders worth around ₹66.64 crore were placed, of which Copthall accounted for approximately ₹66.58 crore, or 99.91%. Its 32 limit buy orders were placed at 3% above the reference price and spread across all Sensex constituents.
The pattern continued during the subsequent spikes. Copthall accounted for ₹126.59 crore, or 96.09%, of the buy-order value during the second spike and approximately ₹98.12 crore, or 85.21%, during the third.
SEBI said the large and aggressive orders appeared to influence the Sensex IEP and were connected to Copthall’s outstanding long call and short put positions.
Mansi’s sell orders
SEBI separately examined Mansi’s activity. Between 15:21:03 and 15:24:59, it placed aggressive sell orders across eight Sensex constituents, aggregating 12.65 lakh shares. Around 7.05 lakh shares were placed at prices 2.5% below the reference price. The entire 12.65 lakh shares were subsequently cancelled between 15:26:02 and 15:26:05.
SEBI said the activity appeared to suppress the Sensex IEP temporarily and benefit Mansi’s expiry-day put option positions.
Wrongful gains
SEBI estimated prima facie wrongful gains of ₹2.96 crore for Copthall and ₹71.65 lakh for Mansi, totalling ₹3.68 crore.
The regulator has ordered the amounts to be impounded, restrained the entities from accessing securities markets and prohibited them from participating in the equity CAS until further orders.
SEBI said protecting the integrity of CAS is critical because the closing price discovered through the mechanism is used for option settlement and mutual fund NAV determination. It also said the new CAS framework gives the regulator greater ability to identify potential manipulation compared with the earlier VWAP system.