While these tax reforms have been welcomed by some, they have also garnered mixed reactions from economists, experts, and taxpayers. Concerns have been raised regarding the tax disparity for income levels above Rs 12 lakh.
Former Chief Economic Advisor Professor Kaushik Basu shared his critique of the proposed tax relief in the 2025 Budget, stating his dissatisfaction with the new taxation regulations.
To illustrate his point, Basu gave an example comparing the additional taxes that Person A and Person B would pay if they each received an extra income of Rs 1 lakh next year. Person A, with an annual income of Rs 12 lakhs, would pay Rs 75k in additional taxes, while Person B, with an annual income of Rs 36 lakhs, would only pay Rs 30k in additional taxes, despite being three times wealthier than Person A.
Reacting to Basu's comments, CA and tax expert Suresh Surana said: "The tweet of Mr. Basu has not considered the impact of health and education cess which is levied on the income tax payable @ 4%. The comparison presented above may not be ideal, as it assumes that the proposed tax rates under the new tax regime will remain the same for both the current year and the next year. However, in reality, the existing slab rates are different, leading to a different tax liability under the current framework."
Elaborating on the tax liability, Surana said: "Under the existing new tax regime, the total tax liability of an individual taxpayer with an income of Rs. 12 lakh is Rs. 1,79,400 (including Rs. 6,900 cess). With the proposed changes, the revised tax liability on Rs. 13 lakh would be Rs. 78,000, resulting in an actual reduction in tax liability of Rs. 1,01,400 (Rs. 1,79,400 less Rs. 78,000)."
Tax liability explained
Income tax slabs under the New Tax Regime after Budget 2025
Income up to Rs 4 lakh: Nil
Income from Rs 4 lakh to Rs 8 lakh: 5 per cent
Income from Rs 8 lakh to Rs 12 lakh: 10 per cent
Income from Rs 12 lakh to Rs 16 lakh: 15 per cent
Income from Rs 16 lakh to Rs 20 lakh: 20 per cent
Income from Rs 20 lakh to Rs 24 lakh: 25 per cent
Income above Rs 24 lakh: 30 per cent
The below mentioned table provides us a clear understanding of Basu’s tweet :
| Particulars |
Mr. A |
Mr. A |
Mr. B |
Mr. B |
| Income Level |
12,00,000 |
13,00,000 |
36,00,000 |
37,00,000 |
| Tax |
60,000 |
75,000 |
6,60,000 |
6,90,000 |
| Health and Education Cess |
2,400 |
3,000 |
26,400 |
27,600 |
| Total Tax Liability |
62,400 |
78,000 |
6,86,400 |
7,17,600 |
|
Rebate u/s 87A |
62,400 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
| Net Tax Liability |
Zero tax |
78,000 |
6,86,400 |
7,17,600 |
| Difference due to increase in income by Rs. 1 Lakh |
|
78,000 |
|
31,200 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Considering the aforementioned table, the key reason for the seemingly disproportionate jump in tax for Mr. A upon earning an additional Rs. 1 lakh is the enhanced rebate under Section 87A, which fully eliminates tax liability up to Rs. 12 lakh but ceases to apply beyond this threshold. This abrupt withdrawal leads to a steep increase in tax liability for any additional income.
For higher-income earners like Mr. B, the incremental tax burden remains more gradual, as they do not benefit from the 87A rebate. While this structure may appear imbalanced in specific scenarios, it aligns with the government's intent to provide greater relief to lower and middle-income taxpayers, ensuring a more progressive tax system.