Business Today
Loading...

LG Polymers: Gross negligence, lack of training caused Vizag gas leak, says NGT report

The report filed by NGT Committee said that clear "cut negligence" and "gross human failure" by LG Polymers was responsible for the Vishakhapatnam Styrene gas leak on May 7

Aneesha Mathur | May 30, 2020 | Updated 18:28 IST
LG Polymers: Gross negligence, lack of training caused Vizag gas leak, says NGT report
LG Polymers chemical plant at Visakhapatnam

LG Polymers, the Indian arm of South Korea's LG Chemical, has been accused of gross negligence for the unfortunate gas leak disaster from its chemical plant in Andhra Pradesh's Visakhapatnam that killed 12 people and injured over 800 people. In a report on the cause of the accident, the Joint Monitoring Committee (JMC) constituted by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) said that "clear cut negligence" and "gross human failure" on the part of the company- LG Polymers- was responsible for the Vishakhapatnam Styrene gas leak on May 7.

The report filed on May 28 indicates that LG Polymers had not complied with basic safety norms in the Styrene plant. More than 800 tonnes of Styrene has escaped from the plant- a gas which is hazardous and can cause breathing difficulties, respiratory illness, and skin irritation.

Besides, the joint monitoring committee, headed by former Andhra Pradesh High court Justice B Sheshasayana Reddy, also called for a Pan India audit of factory safety inspectors and safety standards, "in light of many accidents reported due to failure of safety measures and lack of training."

According to the report, ambient air in urban areas generally contains between 0.29-3.8 microgram/cubic metre of styrene. The chemical odour of styrene can be smelled at 0.32 PPM in the ambient air.

The concentration of Styrene in the air at the village of Venkatapuram, which is about 100 meters from the factory, was beyond hazardous levels at 461 ppm on May 7, 374 ppm after over 24 hours on May 8, and remained at 1.5 ppm even on May 10, three days after the disaster. The concentration remained at over 41.2 microgram even till 14 May, and reduced to below 16.7 microgram by 16 May according to the sampling done by the NEERI team.

Also Read: Vizag gas leak: AP HC orders seizure of LG Polymers' premises; bars directors from leaving India

Styrene is a chemical used to manufacture polystyrene, and is a highly reactive chemical, that needs to be stored at less than 18 degree Celsius to ensure that it does not polymerise. The process of polymerisation where monomers of styrene combine with each other to form larger chains is exothermic - i.e. the process generates heat. As temperature increases, the rate of polymerisation too increases. Unless this is contained by slowing down or arresting the polymerisation, the process can go out of control leading to dangerous increases in temperature and pressure.

According to the NGT committee report, several key lapses were found that led to the disaster---

  • Tank was of an old design.
  • Chiller system was switched off at 6 pm on the previous evening as part of routine maintenance.
  • No temperature or pressure monitoring done at the middle or top of the tank where space was left for vapourisation.
  • Only temperature monitoring gauge was at the bottom of the tank.
  • No interlock system arrangement between the temperature monitoring and refrigeration systems.
  • No external water spray arrangement over the tank in case of temperature increase.
  • Water sprinkler system was not automated. manual sprinklers could not be accessed as it was a hazardous area.
  • Unit could not access personal protective equipment- safety preparedness not there to respond to leak.
  • Siren alarms were not automatic, manual alarm system with controls in the hazard area- no warning could be issued.
  • TBC- Tertiary Butyl Catechol- which is an inhibitor chemical to slow down the reactions-- was not topped up since April 1 since there was no TBC stored at the site.

Even as basic safety protocols were not followed, the response of the officers and workers present at the factory to the gas leak was also slow.

The gas detector alarm was noted by the Control room at 2:54 am, and efforts were made at 3:03 am by the night duty officer to reach the fire hydrant sprinkler valves. The sprinklers could not be activated as they were within the hazardous vapour zone.

It was only at 4:30 am, more than 1.5 hours after the gas leak was detected, that personnel wearing safety SCABA equipment were able to start the sprinkler system. The pumping of emergency chemicals to stabilize the tank, started at about 5:15 am, by which over 800 tonnes of gas had already leaked.

The report has also flagged several lapses by the government and local administration in the tragedy, in addition to the failure of the factory inspectors to ensure that basic safety protocols were put in place at the factory.

  • Neither the Inspector of factory nor the fire officials are aware of how to deal with chemical disasters
  • District administration of Vishakhapatnam and Vizianagaram did not coordinate rescue and relief efforts.
  • People were stopped from fleeing and kept at a nearby school
  • How were building approvals given for human habitation within 100 meters of the factory site? There was no buffer zone left between factory and village of Venkatapuram.

"With the experience world over of Styrene, it takes a considerable amount of idle time to have polymerization inside the tank if effective inhibition and chilling is maintained. The unit failed to assess the situation due to lack of handling experience by trained manpower" says the report, which has recommended criminal prosecution of the LG Polymers company management.

The affidavit filed by the Ministry of Environment and forests (MoEF) on May 29 has also shown a serious lapse on part of the monitoring agencies - the status report filed before NGT by the Central government indicates that the LG Polymers factory did not have proper Environmental clearance or approvals from the Environmental impact assessment authorities.

According to the affidavit, the factory is a category A project, which should have been considered at the central level for approvals. The MoEF affidavit says that the company applied for EC in 2018 to the state environmental impact assessment authority, but no communication has been sent to the Central government till now, even though the Consent to operate for the Unit was issued by the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control board, and is set to expire in December 2021.

Youtube
  • Print

  • COMMENT
BT-Story-Page-B.gif
A    A   A
close