Business Today

BJP vs Congress: How Maharashtra economy performed under last two governments

We have compiled data to compare how the economy of the state has performed under the last two governments -- the incumbent BJP that came to power in 2014 and INC that ruled the state for over a decade until 2014

twitter-logoNiti Kiran | October 18, 2019 | Updated 21:37 IST
BJP vs Congress: How Maharashtra economy performed under last two governments

As Maharashtra heads for its 14th state assembly election on October 21, the incumbent Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has released its manifesto promising to provide 5 crore jobs over the next five years and houses for all by 2022. Another prominent promise of the party includes making Maharashtra a $1 trillion economy. It has also said that it will seek prestigious Bharat Ratna for social activists and social reformers Mahatma Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule and Indian independence activist Veer Savarkar. The BJP aims to create Rs 16,000 crore worth Marathwada drinking water grid project over the next five years if it comes to power in the state. Besides assuring to invest up to Rs 5 lakh crore in infrastructure projects in the state, the party has also promised to create a separate maintenance department to keep a tab on ongoing highway projects.

Only time will tell if the BJP will come to power and if it does how many of these campaign promises it will keep.

Meanwhile, we have compiled data to compare how the economy of the state has performed under the last two governments - the incumbent BJP that came to power in 2014 and Indian National Congress (INC) that ruled the state for over a decade until 2014.

Stable growth

The state's economy has seen a stable growth over the past five years. On an average, the gross state domestic product (GSDP) grew at 7.6 per cent during FY15-18, similar to the growth during FY10-14 (based on the spliced series). The agriculture sector in Maharashtra has been under stress mainly on account of scanty monsoons and shortage of irrigation infrastructure. In terms of gross state value added (GSVA), the agriculture sector has registered a growth of 0.1 per cent on an average during FY15-18 as against 6.3 per cent during FY10-14. The state's economy is mainly driven by services and industrial sector that together contribute nearly 90 per cent to the GSVA, says a CARE Ratings report.

Industrial growth averaged at 7.2 per cent between 2015 and 2018, 1.4 per cent higher than the average 5.8 per cent growth witnessed between 2010 and 2014. Services sector growth increased by 20 basis points from an average of 8.9 per cent during FY10-14 to 9.1 per cent during FY15-18.

Increase in investments in new and stalled projects

New investments in Maharashtra were on a rise during FY15-19 with cumulative investments of Rs 10.5 lakh crore, 56 per cent higher than Rs 6.7 lakh crore new investments during FY10-14 under INC's Prithviraj Chavan.  However, stalled investments in the state increased nearly three times from Rs 3.5 lakh crore during FY10-14 to Rs 10.8 lakh crore during FY15-19 on the cumulative basis.

Fiscal prudence

The state has registered revenue deficit in four out of five years during FY15-19 barring FY18 when it was in revenue surplus position amounting to Rs 2,082 crore. A similar situation was observed during FY10-14 when the state witnessed revenue deficit in four out of five years (revenue surplus in FY13 at Rs 4,211 crore).

In 2010, the fiscal deficit to GSDP was at 3.1 per cent, surpassing the Fiscal Responsibility & Budget Management (FRBM) target of 3 per cent. Thereafter, the ratio of Maharashtra has been below 3 per cent since FY11 within the FRBM norms. Between FY11 and FY14, the fiscal deficit of the state reduced considerably and was maintained below 2 per cent.

During the span of five years of 13th state assembly (from FY15 to FY19), fiscal deficit was lower than 1.5 per cent of the GSDP on two occasions (in FY16 and FY18). The state has been adhering to the debt-to-GSDP norm of 25 per cent as had been prescribed by the 14th Finance Commission. It has moderated from 16.3 per cent in FY14 to 15.6 per cent in FY19 mainly due to higher growth in nominal GSDP.

The state has increased its spending on the agriculture and allied activities in the past five years. The share of expenditure (revenue plus capital) on agriculture and allied services in the total expenditure of the state has increased from 5 per cent in FY10-14 to 8 per cent in FY15-19, highlights the report.  

Physical infrastructure -marginal improvement

Rail density in Maharashtra has seen a marginal improvement from 18.6 km per thousand sq km in FY14 to 18.8 km per thousand sq km in FY17. Road network in the state has expanded with density per 100 sq km of area increasing from 197.8 km in FY14 to 202.8 km in FY17. The state has faced power constraints over the years leading to load shedding in most parts of the state during the peak season. However, the power deficit in the state has declined from 16.6 per cent in FY10 to 1.3 per cent in FY14 and further to 0.2 per cent in FY17. Tele density in the state has improved considerably from 91.3 per cent in FY14 to 107.1 per cent in FY19.

Job scenario

While the BJP promises to provide five crore jobs over the next five years, the current situation on unemployment in the state is no different from the country as a whole. According to Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE)'s monthly time-series data on unemployment, Maharashtra's unemployment rate rose around 1.7 percentage points over the last twelve months compared to a 70 basis points rise at all-India level over the same period. States such as Delhi and Bihar have witnessed a much sharper growth of 7.9 percentage points and 4.9 percentage points over this period. Maharashtra's current unemployment rate of 5.7 per cent in September 2019 is almost 2 percentage points below the all-India level.         

The state's economy has been growing at a steady pace with an impressive growth in industrial sector during the tenure of 13th state assembly (FY15-19). Despite sustained revenue deficit over the years, the fiscal deficit has remained well within the FRBM target while the debt levels are also sustainable, points out the report. The infrastructure has also seen marginal improvement in terms of road, railways, telecom and power. Although new investments are growing, so are the stalled projects. It is a cause of concern.

  • Print
A    A   A