The letter stated that the BCI Rules prescribe standards of professional conduct and etiquette for advocates, and said the dress must be worn by advocates appearing before the Supreme Court, High Courts, subordinate courts, tribunals and other authorities.
DON'T MISS | Mamata Banerjee arrives at Calcutta HC in lawyers’ robes for post-poll violence case
The BCI has asked the state bar council to provide the information within two days, before May 16. It has sought Banerjee’s enrolment number, the date of enrolment and details about if she is enrolled with the state bar council and if her name is still there on the State Roll of Advocates.
It also asked if Banerjee, during her tenure as the chief minister, gave any intimation of voluntary suspension or cessation of her practice. It asked if there is any valid certificate of practice or practice-status record available with the state bar council.
MAMATA’S COURT APPEARANCE
Mamata Banerjee appeared before the Calcutta High Court on Thursday to argue a case related to alleged post-poll violence and attacks on party offices after the announcement of the 2026 Assembly poll results. Clad in a lawyer's gown, Banerjee was accompanied by senior TMC leaders Chandrima Bhattacharya and Kalyan Banerjee.
MUST READ | 'Mamata wall' falls: West Bengal may get benefits of these central schemes under BJP govt
The hearing saw chaotic scenes outside the courtroom as Banerjee, while trying to leave, was met with slogans of "thief" from a section of lawyers. Kalyan Banerjee alleged that lawyers influenced by the BJP tried to heckle the former chief minister and said the party's legal team faced difficulty escorting her out safely.
The case relates to a public interest litigation filed by advocate Shirshanya Bandyopadhyay on behalf of the TMC. The petition alleged attacks on party offices and violence against TMC workers following the declaration of the 2026 Assembly election results.
According to the petitioner, several TMC leaders and workers were allegedly forced to flee their homes after the polls, while many were attacked because of their association with the Trinamool Congress. The petition was filed in the Calcutta High Court on May 12 and was heard by a division bench comprising Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Parthasarathi Sen.