The order was passed by Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Amit Bansal, who allowed Sharma's interim bail after considering his application and submissions made by his counsel.
READ THIS: CJP protest: DMRC closes 16 Delhi metro stations; check full list of affected stations here
Sought two months' bail
Sagar Sharma had sought two months' interim bail after the demise of his father. However, the court granted him relief for 30 days instead. As part of the bail conditions, Sharma has been directed to furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000 along with one surety of the same amount.
In its order dated July 17, the court said: "In view of the above said submissions, interest of justice and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant/accused Sagar Sharma is admitted to interim bail for 30 days from the date of his release on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹50,000 with one sound surety of the like amount."
He will have to surrender before the court after the expiry of the interim bail period and comply with all conditions imposed by the court, as per the news agency. The court clarified that the interim bail being granted was temporary and humanitarian in nature and should not be construed as an observation on the merits of the criminal case.
While granting interim relief, the court made it clear that the criminal proceedings against Sharma will continue in accordance with law after the completion of the bail period.
Background of the case
The case relates to the December 13, 2023, Parliament security breach, when two individuals entered the Lok Sabha chamber from the visitors' gallery during the Winter Session and released coloured smoke canisters, causing panic inside the House. Simultaneously, two others staged a protest outside Parliament using smoke canisters while raising slogans.
ALSO READ: 'This is a disappointing answer': Why Shashi Tharoor isn't satisfied with Centre's reply on UGC-NET, JRF
Sagar Sharma was among the six individuals arrested in connection with the incident. He has remained in judicial custody since December 14, 2023, and has previously been denied regular bail. The accused face charges under stringent provisions, including those under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The trial in the Parliament security breach case is underway.