ALSO READ: Justices Arun Mishra, S Abdul Nazeer, MR Shah - the bench that delivered the judgement that stunned telcos, DoT
Things happened very differently than intended. The Supreme Court bench noted that "the companies have violated the order passed by this Court in pith and substance". The bench said that the telcos have shown "scant respect to the directions issued by this court".
The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) also faced the ire of the apex court, one of its desk officers in particular. Without naming the officer, the court expressed its displeasure over the 'no coercive action' order approved by him that protected telcos if they failed to pay their AGR dues within the stipulated deadline.
"A Desk Officer of the Department of Telecommunications has the temerity to pass the order to the effect of issuing a direction to the Accountant General, another Constitutional Authority, "not to insist for any payment pursuant to the order passed by this Court and not to take any coercive steps till further orders." This is nothing but a device to scuttle order of this Court," the bench observed.
ALSO READ: What's next for Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel after Supreme Court's AGR blow?
In its order on Friday, the Supreme Court drew contempt proceedings against the DoT desk officer for passing the 'no coercive action' order. The directors of telecom companies have been asked to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them "for violating the order passed by this court by not depositing the amount", on the next date of hearing, that is March 17.
"Let the concerned officer, sitting over the order passed by this Court, also file reply," the Supreme Court bench further added.
If the pending AGR dues are not cleared by March 17, all of them will have to appear the Supreme Court in person, the order said.
ALSO READ: AGR case: DoT withdraws 'no-coercive action' order against telcos after SC slams dept