RBI sees green shoots in private investment
The RBI data shows that banks and financial institutions sanctioned 1,032 projects worth ₹4.4 lakh crore in FY26, compared with 907 projects worth ₹3.7 lakh crore a year earlier. Around 55% of the project cost was financed by banks and financial institutions.
Other financing channels also remained active. As many as 509 private non-financial companies raised ₹1.05 lakh crore through external commercial borrowings (ECBs) for capital expenditure, while 298 companies raised ₹23,809 crore through domestic equity issuances.
Infrastructure accounted for 54.2% of the total cost of projects sanctioned by banks and financial institutions, with power emerging as the largest segment, followed by roads and bridges. Construction, chemicals and pesticides, metals and metal products, and cement also attracted significant investment.
MUST READ: India’s weak trade with neighbours is a structural economic disadvantage, says expert
The composition of projects was another positive signal. Greenfield projects accounted for 89.2% of total project costs, suggesting that a large portion of the pipeline involves fresh capacity creation rather than merely modernisation of existing facilities.
The RBI expects the momentum to continue into FY27, with envisaged capex through bank and financial institution financing, ECBs and IPOs projected at ₹3.2 lakh crore, compared with comparable capex of ₹2.6 lakh crore in FY26.
NIPFP highlights the conversion problem
However, NIPFP’s August 2026 policy brief, Navigating India’s Private Capex, presents a more cautious picture. It found that private investment as a share of GDP declined to 10.3% in FY25 from 10.9% in FY23, despite stronger corporate profitability and government measures to support investment.
At the same time, private-sector project announcements more than doubled to ₹104 lakh crore during FY24-FY26, from around ₹56 lakh crore in FY21-FY23.
ALSO READ: BT Big Story: India wants to become a shipbuilding power. Can it match China, Japan & South Korea?
NIPFP said companies are increasingly accumulating cash rather than committing it to greenfield capital expenditure. It also identified geopolitical uncertainty, input-cost volatility, market conditions and promoter risk aversion as important constraints.
The sectoral pattern, however, is changing. Investment is increasingly moving towards renewable energy, data centres, electronics and other new-economy sectors. NIPFP said the share of private investment in renewable energy, conventional energy and IT-enabled services rose to 38% in FY24-FY26 from 25% in FY21-FY23.
RBI vs NIPFP: What the private capex data shows
| RBI view |
NIPFP view |
|---|
| ₹5.6 lakh crore investment intentions across 1,839 projects in FY26, up from ₹5 lakh crore across 1,581 projects in FY25 |
Private investment as a share of GDP fell to 10.3% in FY25 from 10.9% in FY23 |
| Project numbers rose around 16%, while investment value increased nearly 12% |
Private-sector project announcements more than doubled to ₹104 lakh crore during FY24-FY26 |
| Banks and FIs sanctioned 1,032 projects worth ₹4.4 lakh crore |
Companies are increasingly accumulating cash rather than committing it to greenfield capex |
| Infrastructure accounted for 54.2% of sanctioned project costs, led by power |
Investment is shifting towards renewables, data centres, electronics and IT-enabled services |
| 89.2% of project costs were for greenfield projects, pointing to fresh capacity creation |
Geopolitical uncertainty, input costs, market conditions and promoter risk aversion remain constraints |
| ₹1.05 lakh crore raised through ECBs and ₹23,809 crore through domestic equity for capex |
Announced projects do not necessarily translate into actual capital expenditure |
| FY27 envisaged capex projected at ₹3.2 lakh crore, up from ₹2.6 lakh crore in FY26 |
The key challenge is converting the large project pipeline into completed and commissioned capacity |
| RBI cautioned that delays, changes in plans and cancellations could affect realised investment |
NIPFP highlights the gap between project announcements and actual private investment |
DO READ: FIIs pulled out $40 billion from India in 2 years: Why foreign investors are staying away
Intentions versus actual spending
Taken together, the two reports suggest that the private investment story depends increasingly on execution rather than announcements alone. The RBI’s data indicates stronger financing and a substantial pipeline of greenfield projects, while NIPFP highlights the risk that announced investments may not fully translate into completed capacity and actual capital formation.
The RBI itself cautioned that delays, changes in investment plans and cancellations can affect realised spending. The key indicator for the private capex cycle, therefore, will be how much of the current investment pipeline moves from proposal and sanction to actual construction, commissioning and productive capacity.