MUST READ | ‘At the cost of stress, safety...’: Former Jet Airways CEO Sanjiv Kapoor questions 10-min delivery culture
In its judgment delivered on June 30, a bench comprising chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and technical member Barun Mitra held that the 1,656 days spent in litigation during Jet Airways’ prolonged corporate insolvency resolution process must be excluded while computing the 24 months preceding the liquidation commencement date of November 26, 2024.
The tribunal directed the liquidator to recompute workmen’s dues for that protected 24-month period after excluding the 1,656 days and stated that workmen dues for this period cannot be treated as nil.
The ruling arose from appeals related to an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal’s Mumbai bench in February 2026 during the airline’s liquidation proceedings. The NCLAT partly allowed the appeals filed by Jet Airways workmen and dismissed the appeals filed by SBI and other lenders.
DON'T MISS | Totally grounded: NCLT bars Rs 370 cr refund as Jet Airways enters final liquidation phase
According to CNBC-TV18, employees have claimed that their total dues, including provident fund and gratuity, exceed ₹275 crore. In February, the NCLT’s Mumbai bench had directed the liquidator to pay provident fund and gratuity dues to workmen and employees in full, stating these statutory dues do not form part of the liquidation estate under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
SBI had argued before the NCLAT that the exclusion could apply only if Jet Airways had maintained separate and identifiable provident fund and gratuity funds, which the airline had not. The lender contended that these dues should be paid through the normal liquidation pool like other workmen’s claims.
The appellate tribunal rejected this view, holding it was contrary to the text and purpose of the IBC. It said the provisions were "due-centric" and not "asset-centric". The tribunal stated that exclusion of all sums due to any workman and employee from provident fund, pension fund, and gratuity fund from the liquidation estate is not contingent on the existence of such funds on the liquidation commencement date.
MUST READ | 'We must not accept status quo': Ex-Jet Airways CEO as anger grows over civic decay in Delhi-NCR
The tribunal added that accepting SBI’s argument would deprive workmen of their right and entitlement. It said SBI’s interpretation negates the right of workmen and employees to their provident fund, gratuity fund, and pension fund earned through continuous service to the airline.