The plea challenges the constitutional validity of the order issued by the MHA on March 29. The MHA order had stated: All the employers, be it in the industry or the shops and commercial establishments, shall make payment of wages of their workers, at their workplaces, on the due date, without any deduction, for the period their establishments are under closure during lockdown period.
The exporter has additionally challenged the subsequent Maharashtra government order of March 31 to the limited extent of compelling the petitioner to pay full salary to all its staff, workers, contract workers, casual workers during the period of lockdown, when its factories are not operational.
Nagreeka's petition seeks to adjudicate whether the Central government or the Maharashtra government are empowered to issue such a direction to a private establishment to pay 100 per cent wages under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
The exporter also argued that its losses will multiply now since the lockdown has been extended. Additionally, it argued that if it has to follow the government orders in entirety, its business will become unsustainable.
The orders will have "more far reaching consequences, affecting the livelihood of more people," the plea said.
The plea states that the government orders passed by the MHA and the Maharashtra government are "illegal, unconstitutional" and violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India.
The petitioner has asked the apex court to set aside both the Centre's and Maharashtra government's orders to the extent that payment of full salaries were mandated.
Nagreeka further stated that till the pendency of the plea, it should be allowed to pay only 50 per cent of the salaries to its workers.
Also Read: India needs 3% of GDP - not 5% - for coronavirus stimulus: Rangarajan
Also Read: Coronavirus lockdown: Amazon, Flipkart gear up to go full throttle on April 21, but...
Also Read: Coronavirus: India plugs loophole in Chinese 'opportunistic takeover' of firms; govt nod must