Justice Krishna S Dixit further told Twitter that it is not a farmer/ labourer who doesn’t know the law, but is instead a billion-dollar company. He further added that Twitter is free to argue before court to change the cost imposed.
Twitter was represented by Senior Advocates Ashok Haranahalli, Arvind Datar and Advocate Manu Kulkarni represented Twitter while Additional Solicitor General of India R Sankaranarayanan represented the Central government.
Also Watch: Top smartphones launching in July 2023: Nothing Phone (2), OnePlus Nord 3 5G, Motorola Razr 40 series and more
Twitter Karnataka High Court Case
Twitter argued that the Central government was not empowered to issue general orders calling for blocking of social media accounts. It further added that to do so, the government needs to specify reason for blocking their accounts so that it can be communicated to users.
The government, on the other hand, claimed that the order was given to Twitter in national and public interest and to prevent incidents of lynching and mob violence.
The petition was filed challenging ten blocking orders issued by the government between February 2021 and 2022 that ordered Twitter to take down 39 URLs.
Recently, former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey had claimed that the social media platform received threats of being booted out of India after not accepting the request to block certain accounts at the peak of the farmers' protest by the government. To this, Twitter’s Elon Musk responded saying Twitter had no choice but to adhere to the regulations imposed by the Indian government, stating that failure to do so would have resulted in the platform being shut down. He expressed the view that one cannot simply apply American principles universally, highlighting the need to respect and comply with the laws of each country.
Also Read:
Bill Gates's firm asked female candidates about past sexual experiences, presence of naked pictures on phones, STDs: Report
Realme Narzo 60, iQOO Neo 7 Pro, Moto Razr 40 India prices leaked on Amazon