READ THIS: Over 2,800 kg of unsafe paneer, khoya, butter destroyed in Delhi ahead of festive season
Among 23,516 respondents answering the question on FSSAI's proposed two-phase system, 80% said warnings should apply immediately when a product is high in any one of the three nutrients. Only 12% supported the proposed two-phase approach, while 6% wanted warnings only when two or more nutrients are high.
88% want labels to be large and visible
The survey also found strong demand for prominent warnings. Of 23,491 respondents, 88% said the label should be large, clearly visible and immediately noticeable on the front of the pack. Only 10% considered the proposed size sufficient.
On nutritional measurement, 53% of 20,525 respondents preferred warnings based on the total amount of sugar, salt and saturated fat in a product. Another 37% wanted both added and total amounts displayed. Together, 90% wanted total amounts reflected, while only 6% supported an added-only approach.
ALSO READ: Delhi woman flies to Mumbai for ₹20 vada pav, spends ₹15,000; netizens call it ‘ameero ke struggle’
Consumers want a 6-month deadline
Speed of implementation was another major demand. Among 20,068 respondents, 88% said food and beverage companies should implement front-of-pack warnings within six months. Only 6% opted for 12 months, while 4% preferred longer timelines or could not say.
Meanwhile, 89% of 20,435 respondents wanted the warnings prominently displayed on e-commerce and quick-commerce platforms before adding products to their carts.