Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has escalated the situation by issuing a legal notice to Twitter, demanding an explanation for its practices. Notably, a third of all complaints received by Inman Grant's office regarding online hate were related to Twitter, despite the platform having fewer users compared to TikTok or Meta's Facebook and Instagram.
In a statement, Grant expressed her concerns about Twitter's inadequacies in combating hate speech. She highlighted the platform's reinstatement of 62,000 previously banned accounts, including those held by high-profile individuals who promote Nazi rhetoric. Grant underlined the need for accountability and user protection, asserting that transparency is integral to achieving this objective, hence the issuance of the legal notice.
In her letter to Twitter, Inman Grant specifically called for explanations regarding the impact assessments conducted when reinstating banned accounts, the platform's engagement with communities subjected to online hate, and the enforcement of its own policies prohibiting hateful conduct.
Twitter now has 28 days to respond to the eSafety Commissioner, failing which it may face a daily fine of nearly A$7,00,000 (Rs 3.88 crore).
This demand from the Australian cyber regulator arises as the country approaches a referendum on the recognition of Indigenous people in the constitution, igniting a fervent debate on racial issues.
Notably, Indigenous television host Stan Grant cited targeted abuse on Twitter as a reason for his temporary departure from the media last month, as highlighted by the commissioner. Additionally, National Indigenous Television, a specialist broadcaster, announced a hiatus from Twitter due to the platform's persistent racism and hate, as expressed in a tweet issued last month.
Also Read
'Buying Netflix at $4 billion would've been better instead of...': Former Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer
ChatGPT beats top investment funds in stock-picking experiment