Must Read: Apple’s next big health gadget could be a screenless fitness band
What differences are there between QLC and TLC?
The amount of data that can be stored in each memory cell is what makes the difference: QLC stores four bits per cell whereas TLC stores three bits per cell. The higher density allows manufacturers to provide greater storage capacities, but it can also have an effect on performance when data is being written continuously.
HOMOLAB carried out a comparison between a 1TB iPhone 18 Pro Max based on QLC technology and an iPhone 18 Pro with 512GB using TLC storage. In testing involving 4K reads, both phones produced similar results. Yet, in a low-queue-depth mixed workload, the QLC device achieved a score of 8,168 whereas the TLC device scored 11,285, which meant that the TLC model had a 38 per cent advantage. When the workloads were heavier, the TLC model still held a 12 per cent lead.
Must Read: Apple October Event: From OLED iPad mini to Home Hub, here’s what Apple may launch
What causes speeds to drop so considerably?
The iPhone 18 Pro Max initially uses an SLC cache, the speed of which can go as high as 3,000MB/s; when this cache is used up, a second buffer based on TLC takes over and operates at an average speed of 578MB/s.
Once both caches have been filled, the data is written directly to the QLC storage. HOMOLAB measured average speeds of 79.4MB/s at this stage, the performance at times falling down to 25.6MB/s.
The problem gets worse as the storage fills. When the capacity reaches 60 per cent, the SLC cache is said to decrease from 250GB to 58GB and direct QLC writes then averaged 45MB/s, dropping as low as 1.1MB/s in the test.
Should you worry?
For the average iPhone user it is very unlikely. Tasks carried out every day such as browsing the web, sending messages, playing games and taking photographs will not reveal this difference. The gap in performance does, however, become important if you regularly record 4K or ProRes video or transfer large files or carry out backup restores.