“At the end of the day, Hormuz will be the red line,” one Gulf source close to government circles told the news agency, adding: “It wasn’t an issue before. It is now. The goal posts have moved.”
DON'T MISS | Hormuz flashpoint: Indian Navy steps up vigil after ships targeted, issues advisory
Gulf officials have warned that the current diplomatic approach could entrench Iran's control over Middle Eastern energy supplies. This approach prioritises global economic stability but leaves countries in the region vulnerable to energy and security consequences without formal decision-making power.
Concerns are growing that US-Iran diplomacy is increasingly centred on enrichment levels, with a tacit acceptance of Tehran's influence over Hormuz, which accounts for about a fifth of the world's oil supplies. The shift in negotiation priorities, particularly regarding uranium enrichment, is seen as troubling by Gulf officials.
Medvedev's remarks on social media have underscored the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz. He said, “It’s not clear how the truce between Washington and Tehran will play out but one thing is certain -- Iran has tested its nuclear weapons. It is called the Strait of Hormuz. Its potential is inexhaustible.”
MUST READ | BT Explainer: Why is Iran saying it has blocked the Hormuz Strait again?
Iranian security officials have echoed this sentiment, describing the Strait as a long-prepared instrument of deterrence and a valuable geopolitical asset.
Analysts have indicated that the focus on Hormuz in negotiations marginalises Gulf security concerns, as discussions are increasingly framed around its global economic impact rather than addressing regional threats such as Iranian missiles and proxies.
Gulf nations have advised caution regarding sanctions relief, advocating for a phased approach to test Iran's behaviour. They emphasise that core threats, including missiles and armed proxies, remain unaddressed.